Context
Measuring panelist bias across paper scoresheets versus digital touch-guided evaluation forms.
Cross-evaluation between standard SCA cupping forms and quantitative descriptor digital interfaces.

Standardized laboratory framework documenting empirical findings, challenges, and architectural decisions.
Measuring panelist bias across paper scoresheets versus digital touch-guided evaluation forms.
3 blind cupping rounds with 6 calibrated evaluators testing 8 Tolima Geisha and Castillo lots.
Guided digital inputs decreased sweetness score dispersion by 18% with zero skew to overall cup score.
External panel calibration and publishing the anonymized open dataset.